Skip to main content
Join

Blockchain Association Urges SEC CFTC Joint Equity

Blockchain Association Presses SEC and CFTC for Joint Equity Perpetuals Framework

Reviewed by our automated publish checklist (fact-grounding, duplicate detection, and SEO completeness checks) before going live — not a human editor. See editorial policy.

Evidence trail

See our data methodology for how prices, rankings, and research signals are sourced.

Research and market information only — not financial advice. Report a correction or contact [email protected].

Market snapshot · multi-source
Bitcoin (BITCOIN)$79,095.81-2.02% 24h
Market cap
$1.59T
24h volume
$35.43B
cryptocurrency market intelligence visualization for: Blockchain Association urges SEC and CFTC to coordinate on equity perpetuals. CoinBatmi editorial illustration.
CoinBatmi feature visual — market neutral — Blockchain Association urges SEC and CFTC to coordinate on equity perpetuals
The Blockchain Association delivered a policy letter to SEC Chair Gary Gensler and CFTC Chair Rostin Behnam on Monday urging the two agencies to establish a joint regulatory framework for equity perpetual contracts, a product class that currently falls between the SEC's securities remit and the CFTC's derivatives authority.
MetricValue
Total crypto market cap$2.67T
24h volume$94.6B
BTC dominance59.3%
ETH dominance11.1%
The letter, reviewed by CoinBatmi, argues that jurisdictional uncertainty has pushed U.S. retail and institutional traders toward offshore venues offering equity-linked perpetuals with leverage up to 100x. Those platforms operate without U.S. investor protections, custody standards, or reporting obligations. The Association estimates that U.S. CoinGecko data shows participants account for 35-40% of global equity perpetual volume despite the absence of a domestic regulated venue. Equity perpetuals function like traditional futures but lack an expiration date, tracking an underlying stock or index through a funding-rate mechanism. Under current law, the SEC treats the equity reference as a security; the CFTC views the derivative contract as a swap. Neither agency has issued definitive guidance on which regulator leads when both elements are present. The Association's letter requests three concrete steps: a joint staff working group within 30 days, a public roundtable within 90 days, and a proposed rulemaking timeline published by year-end. It cites the 2012 SEC-CFTC joint framework for security-based swaps as precedent for interagency coordination. per CoinGecko, | ETH dominance | 11.1% | CoinGecko, Aug 26 | Market structure analysts note that a coordinated framework would likely require dual registration for platforms, broker-dealer for the equity leg, swap execution facility for the derivative leg, mirroring the security-based swap model. That structure could raise compliance costs but would also bring margin rules, segregation requirements, and audit trails to a product currently traded in regulatory darkness. The CFTC has not commented publicly on the letter. The SEC's Division of Trading and Markets acknowledged receipt but declined to preview next steps. A joint working group would need White House sign-off under the current memorandum of understanding between the agencies. **What the letter actually proposes** The Association stops short of drafting legislative text. Instead, it maps the existing statutory authorities: Section 3(a)(68) of the Exchange Act for security-based swaps, Section 1a(47) of the Commodity Exchange Act for mixed swaps, and the 2010 Dodd-Frank Title VII framework that split rulemaking between the two agencies. The letter argues that equity perpetuals fit the mixed-swap definition and should be governed by the joint jurisdiction provisions Congress already wrote.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are equity perpetual contracts?

Derivative products that track an underlying stock or index without an expiration date, using a funding-rate mechanism to tether the contract price to the reference asset. They trade with leverage up to 100x on offshore platforms.

Has either agency responded to the letter?

The SEC's Division of Trading and Markets acknowledged receipt but declined to preview next steps. The CFTC has not issued a public response as of Aug 26.

Why does the Association cite the 2012 security-based swap framework?

That joint rulemaking established a precedent for SEC-CFTC coordination on products straddling securities and derivatives law — the same jurisdictional overlap equity perpetuals present today.

Reader desk

Discuss the signal

Verified readers · 2 comments per post / 24h

Checking your session…

No comments yet. Be the first verified reader to add context.