We must follow EXPLAINER structure: What it is in one sentence → how it works, step by step → who is affected and how → why it is happening now → what to watch next.
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Price | $86,555 |
| 24h Change | +0.58% |
| Global Market Cap | $2.94 T |
| BTC Dominance | 58.9% |
| 7d Change | +12.6% |
We need to keep paragraphs 1-3 sentences, under 55 words each. Must vary sentence length.
We need FAQ with 2-3 Q&A.
We need SEO section.
Now KEY_POINTS: 3-5 bullets, each a complete sentence with numbers, levels, dates, names, entities.
Bullet 1: Bitcoin trades at $86,555 with a 0.58% 24‑hour gain, per CoinGecko. (That's a figure with attribution.)
Bullet 3: Global crypto market cap stands at $2.94 T, with Bitcoin dominance at 58.9%, per the research dossier. (Attribution.)
Bullet 4: Bitcoin's 7‑day closing prices rose from $75,772 to $85,657, adding 12.6% over the week. (Attribution to research dossier.)
Bullet 5: On‑chain data shows Bitcoin's circulating supply unchanged at 20.09 million coins. (Attribution to on-chain context.)
Check banned subheadings: none of those are banned. Must not be generic like "What Happened". These are specific.
Now paragraphs: 1-3 sentences, under 55 words each.
We must use exactly those numbers. Ensure labels correspond to days; we have 7 numbers.
Now data table: need pipe table with header and separator row. Let's create a table comparing Bitcoin price, market cap, dominance, 24h volume, 7d change.
Header: Metric | Value | 24h Change | Source
We must not invent rows; all numbers from facts. Ensure we attribute source once per section. We'll have a section for the table; we can attribute source at first use: "CoinGecko has Bitcoin at $86,555".
Then later rows in same section can stand alone without repeating source. But we have multiple sources; we need to name source once per section. If we mix CoinGecko and research dossier in same section, we might need to attribute each?
The rule: "Attribute the FIRST figure in a section with a named source ("CoinGecko has Solana at $76.82"). Later figures in that same section stand alone, do not repeat the source phrase." So if we have multiple sources, we need to decide sections.
Better to split: one section for CoinGecko data (price, volume, 7d change) and another for research dossier (market cap, dominance, total market cap). But we can also attribute each first figure with its source, then later figures in that section stand alone. However if we change source mid-section, that might violate.
Safer to have separate sections: one for CoinGecko metrics, one for research dossier metrics. But we only need one table; we can attribute each row individually? The rule says attribute the FIRST figure in a section with a named source.
If we have multiple sources, we could treat each row as its own section? Not ideal. Maybe we can attribute the table overall with a combined source?
Not allowed. We could attribute the first figure (price) to CoinGecko, and then later rows can stand alone even if they are from other sources? That would be inaccurate because we would be attributing market cap to CoinGecko incorrectly.
So we need to avoid mixing sources in same section. Let's create two tables: one for CoinGecko metrics, one for research dossier metrics. But we need at least two rich elements; we already have chart spec; we could have only one table.
But we can also include a second table as another rich element? The instruction: use at least TWO of these where they genuinely add signal: data table, chart spec, verified social post. So we need at least two.
We have chart spec; we need another rich element, could be a second data table. So we can have two tables: one from CoinGecko, one from research dossier. That satisfies.
Table 1: CoinGecko metrics (price, 24h volume, 7d change). Attribute first figure to CoinGecko.
Table 2: Research dossier metrics (market cap, dominance, total crypto market cap, 24h market cap change, BTC dominance, ETH dominance). Attribute first figure to Research dossier.
We must ensure each table has at least 2 meaningful data rows.
Now we need to embed chart spec and tables in body.
Bitcoin price action amid ruble launch
Miner revenue and hashrate stability
Watchpoints: ruble adoption and BTC dominance
Check each subheading references something concrete: "Digital ruble rollout and payment speed" references digital ruble and payment speed (from context). "Bitcoin price action amid ruble launch" references Bitcoin price action and ruble launch. "Miner revenue and hashrate stability" references miner revenue and hashrate (we have on-chain supply).
"Watchpoints: ruble adoption and BTC dominance" references ruble adoption and BTC dominance.
We need to embed the rich elements (tables, chart) somewhere, maybe after relevant subheading.
We must ensure we use all data: we must use every material number from facts. Let's list all numbers from research context and live coin data:
We have to use each number at least once. Let's plan:
We must ensure each number appears exactly as given, with correct formatting. Use commas? We'll use the numbers as given.
Now let's craft the article.
Thus we can allocate numbers across bullets, tables, chart, paragraphs.
KEY_POINTS bullets (5 bullets) each containing some numbers:
1. Bitcoin trades at $86,555 with a 0.58% 24‑hour gain, per CoinGecko. (price, 24h change) 2.
Russia’s digital ruble aims to settle payments in seconds, according to the prime minister’s statement on a fast and independent payment infrastructure. (no numbers) 3. Global crypto market cap stands at $2.94 T, with Bitcoin dominance at 58.9% and ETH dominance at 11.4%, per the research dossier.
(total market cap, BTC dominance, ETH dominance) 4. Bitcoin’s 7‑day closing prices rose from $75,772.47 to $85,657.24, adding 12.56% over the week, per CoinGecko. (7d closes start and end, 7d change) 5.
Reader desk
Discuss the signal
Verified readers · 2 comments per post / 24h
No comments yet. Be the first verified reader to add context.