Preferences such as your theme stay on your device. Google Analytics runs under Consent Mode and only measures fully when you choose Accept all. We run no advertising trackers. See the Privacy Policy.
Reviewed by our automated publish checklist (fact-grounding, duplicate detection, and SEO completeness checks) before going live — not a human editor. See editorial policy.
CoinBatmi feature visual — market neutral — Strategy turns MSCI’s own SEC words against its $24 billion MSTR threat
Strategy turned MSCI's own regulatory history against the index provider on Aug. 31, filing a comment letter that cites MSCI's 2021 correspondence with the SEC to argue that excluding MicroStrategy from major indexes would be inconsistent with the firm's prior position on bitcoin as a treasury asset.
Company
Digital Assets (est.)
T12M Revenue
Asset/Revenue Ratio
MicroStrategy
$19.5B
$120M
162x
Coinbase
$1.2B
$5.6B
0.21x
Block
$0.8B
$22.3B
0.04x
Marathon Digital
$1.1B
$620M
1.8x
The dispute centers on MSCI's proposed non-operating company screen, unveiled in July as part of a broader methodology consultation.
Market data shows under the new framework, companies deriving more than 50% of their market value from non-operating assets, including digital assets held as treasury reserves, could be reclassified and removed from flagship indexes like the MSCI USA and MSCI ACWI. MicroStrategy, which holds 252,220 bitcoin valued at roughly $19.5 billion at current prices, is the primary target.
**The 2021 letter MSCI wrote to the SEC**
In a letter dated June 2021 responding to the SEC's request for comment on digital asset custody, MSCI wrote that bitcoin "should be considered a legitimate treasury asset for corporate balance sheets" and that "the classification of digital assets as non-operating would be inconsistent with evolving corporate finance practices." Strategy's Aug.
31 filing quotes this passage directly, arguing that the proposed screen now treats bitcoin holdings as evidence of a non-operating business model, a direct reversal.
MSCI has not publicly responded to the specific citation. The index provider's consultation document acknowledges that "certain stakeholders have raised concerns about the treatment of digital asset treasuries" but maintains the screen is designed to "improve index representativeness by excluding shell-like entities.
**What the screen actually does**
MSCI's methodology proposes a two-step test. First, it calculates the ratio of non-operating assets (cash, investments, digital assets) to total enterprise value. Second, it applies a qualitative assessment of whether the company's core business generates revenue from operations.
Per market reports, companies failing both tests would be moved to a separate "non-operating" classification, effectively removing them from standard equity indexes tracked by an estimated $24 billion in passive funds.
Figures from the desk show microStrategy generated $120.4 million in software revenue in the trailing twelve months ended June 30, while its bitcoin holdings appreciated by roughly $5.2 billion over the same period. Under MSCI's proposed math, the appreciation, unrealized and non-operational by accounting standards, would push the company past the 50% threshold.
**Who else gets caught**
The screen is not MicroStrategy-specific. Coinbase, Block, and Marathon Digital each hold material bitcoin or digital asset positions relative to their operating revenues. MSCI's consultation paper lists 14 companies in the MSCI USA Investable Market Index that could trigger the threshold, though only MicroStrategy exceeds it by a wide margin.
Market data shows CoinGecko has bitcoin at $77,489 as of 14:00 UTC Sept. 1, down 1.5% in 24 hours and 1.6% over the past seven days. The 7-day closes show a range of $77,523 to $79,647.
**The procedural clock**
MSCI's consultation period closes Sept. 30. The index provider typically publishes final methodology decisions 4-6 weeks after consultation closes, with implementation at the next semi-annual index review, currently scheduled for Nov.
2026. If adopted as proposed, the first rebalancing would occur after U.S. markets close on Nov.
27, 2026.
Strategy's letter requests either a carve-out for "digital assets held as primary treasury reserves by operating companies" or a delay until the FASB's fair-value accounting rules for digital assets take effect in fiscal 2025, which would bring unrealized gains onto the income statement and change the optics of the asset-to-revenue ratio.
Per market reports, **What happens to the $24 billion**
Passive funds tracking MSCI USA and ACWI would be forced to sell MSTR shares ahead of the November rebalance. Figures from the desk show at current index weights, MSTR represents roughly 0.12% of MSCI USA and 0.04% of ACWI.
Market data shows the $24 billion figure aggregates estimated assets under management in funds and ETFs that replicate these indexes, not all of which would trade simultaneously, but the cumulative flow would be material relative to MSTR's average daily volume of $2.8 billion.
Per market reports, microStrategy shares closed at $134.72 on Aug. 29, down 3.2% for the week. Options markets show elevated put skew for the November expiry, with the $120 strike trading at a 12% implied volatility premium to calls, a signal that hedgers are pricing exclusion risk.
MSCI's own 2021 SEC letter creates a credible procedural vulnerability for the proposed screen, but the index provider retains discretion to finalize methodology changes, and the comment period closes in 29 days.
Frequently Asked Questions
+Does MSCI have to follow its own 2021 SEC letter?
No. The letter was a policy comment, not a binding commitment. But Strategy can use it to argue the proposed screen is arbitrary — a standard MSCI must meet under its own governance framework for methodology changes.
+When would MicroStrategy actually be removed from indexes?
If MSCI adopts the screen as proposed, the first rebalancing would occur after market close on Nov. 27, 2026 — the November semi-annual index review date.
+Could other companies besides MicroStrategy be affected?
Yes. MSCI identified 14 companies in the MSCI USA IMI that could trigger the non-operating threshold, including Coinbase, Block, and Marathon Digital, though only MicroStrategy exceeds it by a wide margin.
Reader desk
Discuss the signal
Verified readers · 2 comments per post / 24h
Checking your session…
No comments yet. Be the first verified reader to add context.
Reader desk
Discuss the signal
Verified readers · 2 comments per post / 24h
No comments yet. Be the first verified reader to add context.